Colloidal Silver (An Analytical -
Investigative Report & Theoretical Overview)
(1) Introduction
As you
may know the FDA ruled several years ago that, colloidal silver is not
legal in OTC products. OTC meaning, over the counter use, meaning in
essence that it is not to be used as a medicine. For more information
about the legal aspects of colloidal silver, click on the "Research"
link at the top of the main page, it is important reading for people
interested in manufacturing colloidal silver for any kind of commercial
purpose.
Welcome to one of the most important areas of research of this or any
era. After years of personal research and contemplation on the subject
of ?colloidal silver?. I have concluded that the disciplines involved
are too numerous for my presentation to be all things to all people, but
that is still my goal.
One of the main problems is that each area of expertise has a highly
specialized system and jargon, which does not always translate well
between other disciplines. Quantum mechanics, Physics, colloidal
chemistry etc. each has within the general area of study, highly
specialized areas of focus. For example ?Electro-chemistry in colloids
and dispersions? Is a specialized field of study within colloidal
chemistry, though there many others examples.
Each discipline and area of focus in turn leads to a staggering number
of potential applications.
My
sincere belief is that the most needed research involves use of colloids
in improving the human and planetary condition, the material will
therefore reflect this conviction and area of focus.
My desire is to present this material in such a way that the broadest
number of people, from the most varied number of backgrounds possible,
may easily read and understand what it is that I want to convey. So that
is how I intend to present this material.
There is no reason why scientific study cannot be alive, vibrant,
interesting and relevant to anyone and everyone. I think you will find
the material here more than just interesting and not just for
scientists.
I have attempted to satisfy my need for a complete explanation of
critical fundamental issues regarding the nature of colloids, and why
they do the things they do. In my attempt to use existing orthodox
scientific principles I have found them to be lacking in scope,
inconclusive and biased toward the mechanistic.
A mechanistic approach may be provable and applicable where machines and
mechanistic systems are concerned, but they falter and are rendered
invalid where bio-systems are concerned. Looking at the state of the
world today it does not take a genius to recognize that the mechanistic
/ technological status quo, is out of balance, and if left to continue
unchallenged will lead to a self terminating end. There is no time to
waste, in order to right this wrong.
Orthodox principles that are in vogue are not a sound approach where
living systems are concerned. A very one-sided approach has been
accepted as status quo, which is in dire need of some serious
rethinking. They do not know as much as they would lead you to believe.
Belief in a narrow view has caused many to overlook the overview. There
are existing theorems already presented to academia since the early
1900?s. that are provable, valid and all encompassing, that could be
embraced. Such valid theorems could create balanced harmonious,
sustainable scientific technological approaches, and solutions.
Currently theorems that are accepted as irrefutable fact, when
challenged with evidence that is contrary, and possibly invalidates its
basic premise, are patently invalidated. Rather than rewriting the
science books, and adjusting the theory, the evidence is patently
admonished as invalid.
For example: Acceptance of the theory of relativity presupposes that a
free energy device is not possible. Any device proclaimed to produce
free energy supposedly violates the laws of energy conservation. What
should happen instead is that, at the true presentation of a valid free
energy device, the law of energy conservation should be found to be in
violation of the laws of nature!
For example: A Patent was awarded for: Zero-Point Energy Extraction
Device, on December 31, 1996. U.S. Patent Number 5,590,031 has been
awarded to Franklin B. Mead Jr. and Jack Nachamkin. Their patent is for
a system that converts electromagnetic radiation energy to electrical
energy. Opening the door to the development of technologies that are in
violation of the so-called ?Law of Energy Conservation.?
US patent here:
http://patents.uspto.gov/cgi-bin/ifetch4?ENG+PATBIB-ALL+0+960878+0+4+121427+OF+1+1+1+PN%2f5590031
The point is being made, because it illustrates that there is plenty of
room for changes in our perspective. Where colloids are concerned, in
time, there will no doubt be found, principles and phenomena that are
intertwined with many other seemingly unrelated fields of research and
endeavor. There may be a correlation to free energy of or called ?zero
point energy.? This could actually most easily relate to colloids and
bio-systems, so is not only relevant, but also helps frame perspectives
to help with an explanation and understanding of the underlying
principles involved with this science as a whole.
If colloidal silver / silver mineral water proves effective in lab tests
against pathogens, which it has, why wouldn't clinical testing follow?
Why wouldn't formal testing be considered for use with humans. If silver
water is effective against organisms that cause disease in humans in a
lab, as it has been shown. Why then would it not be even considered for
uses in medicine? Why would research for potential applications such as
an antibiotic be abandoned before the research is started? Is it because
the concept of such profound effects from simple mineral water are
contrary to poplar belief? With profound results from lab tests pointing
the way, and justifying continued serious research, to do otherwise is
testimony to an error in thinking on the part of researchers.
VICTOR SCHAUBERGER (1885 ? 1958) will in time be found to be the founder
of harmonious systems of thought. It is unfortunate that he is not
widely recognized by all sciences and academia. It seems he suffered a
similar fate as did Nicola Tesla. ? Cheers Victor -
Next Article:
What Is A Colloid?
